The origins of human migration has been brought into question. Many still claim that we as humans came out of Africa. This is based on land migrations and family trees that show how blood lines have traveled across the globe. This does not a count for travel by sea. As Osharian doctrine states " Man came in five races or families." If you study the soil of the major continents you will find that soil color is the same as color of race. It turns out that if you eat plants and animals they have soil in them. So the soil is in the food. This can and has caused humans to be of that color. The migrations and mixing of races can be traced threw the origin of soil color. Weather and other condition can also change humans. We find that people with dark skin live in areas where there is a great deal of sun. People that live in cold and darker areas seem to be of lighter skin color. As stated in the Tables of O-Notis," All races or families started in different areas of the land masses. At some point in history the peoples began to migrate out from their starting points. At some point the races met and shared knowledge and women to keep some variation in their blood lines. These family grew in population and became large families later called tribes". Prehistory shows that for some 12 thousands years there has been trade between continents. Tobacco and cocaine have been found in dead bodies from areas that do not grow these products naturally. Trade between continents in Osharian doctrines go back to 50,000 B.C. Many cultures claim their origins from sea based peoples from the Atlantic ocean region. The Maya state that they were tot pyramid building from the white plumed serpent tribe, that had come across the sea. The Hebrews talk of a ancient mother land called Anahual which was said to have sunk before their migration to the Gaza strip. There are many more of these cultures that claim origins from sea based peoples. Here is apart of the Tables of O-Notis that talks about the origins of different humans of Earth.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Osharian view of Altarian sea kings
The origins of human migration has been brought into question. Many still claim that we as humans came out of Africa. This is based on land migrations and family trees that show how blood lines have traveled across the globe. This does not a count for travel by sea. As Osharian doctrine states " Man came in five races or families." If you study the soil of the major continents you will find that soil color is the same as color of race. It turns out that if you eat plants and animals they have soil in them. So the soil is in the food. This can and has caused humans to be of that color. The migrations and mixing of races can be traced threw the origin of soil color. Weather and other condition can also change humans. We find that people with dark skin live in areas where there is a great deal of sun. People that live in cold and darker areas seem to be of lighter skin color. As stated in the Tables of O-Notis," All races or families started in different areas of the land masses. At some point in history the peoples began to migrate out from their starting points. At some point the races met and shared knowledge and women to keep some variation in their blood lines. These family grew in population and became large families later called tribes". Prehistory shows that for some 12 thousands years there has been trade between continents. Tobacco and cocaine have been found in dead bodies from areas that do not grow these products naturally. Trade between continents in Osharian doctrines go back to 50,000 B.C. Many cultures claim their origins from sea based peoples from the Atlantic ocean region. The Maya state that they were tot pyramid building from the white plumed serpent tribe, that had come across the sea. The Hebrews talk of a ancient mother land called Anahual which was said to have sunk before their migration to the Gaza strip. There are many more of these cultures that claim origins from sea based peoples. Here is apart of the Tables of O-Notis that talks about the origins of different humans of Earth.
Friday, November 13, 2009
Osharian source information list
Many people have asked me where this information comes from. Some of it comes from Osharian doctrines past down through out the ages. Many of these records are in fragments that have come from a number of ancient sources. I have spent over 23 years of study and investigation on the subject of the Oshar. Some information was gained by the Oshar, but much of it came from hundreds of other records from other cultures through out time. Below is a list of many but not all of the sources of information obtained on this subject. Note that many of this information has in the past been forbidden to access by the public. Some records are yet to be translated into English. Other information is highly restricted and protected by other groups. I have worked with many of these groups to obtain some but not all of this restricted information. We as Oshar do not believe in any information unless it has been research and cross referenced with other fields of science. In the end the Oshar have been destroyed over and over. This is why for many of thousands of years the Oshar have remained secret and underground. It is only in the information age that we have come out of hiding to seek out other Osharians and to begin relationships with other orders and groups. Once again I would like to point out that this is the beliefs of the Osharian Rite Freemasons and no other groups. If people in modern times can believe in the new doctrine of the Holy Bible that is no more than 4,000 years old, then it is not to hard to believe in doctrine that is many thousands of years older. Many people believe in the Holy Bible with out question and with out first researching any other sources of information to prove or disprove this doctrine. Also with out first researching the origins of the Holy Bible. People please do your home work before giving into any one school of belief, and or doctrine. We don't state this information lightly. Some groups will undermine our findings because it doesn't follow their own doctrines. Some of our doctrine is undermined by other groups because they have gone out of their way to cover up, hide or destroy such information. Our knowledge has been sacred and secret for good reason. Mankind doesn't want people to know the great evil and bad things we have done to our selves and our people over the ages. We the Oshar have gone out of our way to uncover the hidden truth of history. If you don't believe, then do your own research to see what you may uncover.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Osharian Impactor theory
Science has come a long way in our time period. But some things still remain the same. The idea that the planet Earth was hit by an object is one of these things that hasn't changed. Modern science has now come up with new theories on an old subject. Here are some hyper links that talk about the new theory of impact. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_impact_hypothesis
In the movie version of stopping an asteroid from hitting Earth popularized by Armageddon, a few brave Americans quickly head out to the near-Earth object and blow it up.
The reality will be far less dramatic, former astronaut Rusty Schweickart told scientists at the American Geophysical Union meeting here Wednesday. Asteroid-deflection efforts will have to start years before a prospective impact and will have to be essentially international.
“Whether or not the international community, within or outside the United Nations, can rise to the demands of such a challenge in advance of an impact … is problematic,” Schweickart summarized.
Two general strategies for deflecting asteroids are currently on the table. The first is some type of impactor or blast, possibly nuclear, that would knock the asteroid off the collision course. The second is a longer-term “shepherding” operation that would slowly morph the asteroid’s trajectory in space so that it misses Earth. Both schemes would have major international implications.
Nuclear weapons have been explicitly outlawed in space since the Partial Test Ban Treaty was negotiated in 1963. Sending a nuclear weapon into space to hit an asteroid would require modifying the treaty, which could have unforeseen negative repercussions.
“Many of us have expressed our concern about nuclear effects because of political options,” said David Morrison, an astronomer at NASA Ames Research Center who organized a session at the AGU meeting about near-Earth objects.
Schweickart’s group, The B612 Foundation, has advocated a different approach to asteroid deflection, but one that will require an equally difficult international negotiation. They propose to bump or tow an asteroid “in a controlled manner” so that it misses Earth. The only problem is that such a process would take time and as the asteroid’s trajectory changed, it would be “pointed” at different places along a horizontal plane on Earth called the risk corridor.
That’s a major geopolitical problem, Schweickart said, because it requires temporarily increasing the risk to one population — in the example above, Venezuela, or Russia — to eventually eliminate the risk for the entire Earth.
“It’s going to be slowly dragged across the Earth. That is a binary decision,” Schweickart said. “You don’t have the option of dragging it down through the Antarctic.”
Who gets to decide which way the asteroid is dragged away from an impact with Earth? The United Nations? The United States? Russia? Some independent body of astronomers and space agencies?
“What deflection technologies are OK and who says they are OK?” Schweickart asked. “Who accepts liability? How do you decide that it’s OK to endanger the people of Venezuela or the people of Kazakhstan?”
He called figuring such questions out a “geopolitical decision of the first order.” Earlier this year, the Association of Space Explorers presented a report to the U.N. Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space recommending that some international decision-making bodies be created to evaluate and respond to near-Earth object hazards.
The U.N. committee could bring some options before the General Assembly by 2012, although Schweickart has some doubts that people are politically prepared to deal with the tough decisions that humanity could face to deflect an asteroid.
Our young sun didn't cast off enough heat to keep baby Earth's water from freezing. Yet, the geologic record clearly shows a planet bathed in liquid water. How it happened is again up for debate after new research challenges a long-held theory that greenhouse gases trapped in the atmosphere helped keep things warm. New analysis of 3.8 billion-year-old sediments from West Greenland shows it contains minerals that couldn't have formed had there been high levels of carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere, says University of Copenhagen geologist Minik Rosing. "We can therefore deduce that greenhouse warming from the atmosphere would have been insufficient to keep Earth warm at that time," Rosing told Discovery News. This backs up the Osharian belief that Earth was a large ice locked moon, then when it was hit it heated the ice up and changed the orbit.